Skip to content

Conversation

jyn514
Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 commented Apr 9, 2021

This regressed in #81764. After that PR, rustdoc compiled the regex for every single item in the crate: https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=125505306744a0a5bb01d62337260a95d9ff8d57&end=2e495d2e845cf27740e3665f718acfd3aa17253e&stat=instructions%3Au

This would have been caught by clippy::declare_interior_mutable_const (cc #77983).

Before, this was compiling the regex on every single item in the crate.

This would have been caught by `clippy::declare_interior_mutable_const`.
@jyn514 jyn514 added T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. I-compiletime Issue: Problems and improvements with respect to compile times. labels Apr 9, 2021
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @ollie27

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 9, 2021
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Apr 9, 2021

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Apr 9, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 9, 2021

⌛ Trying commit 8c7b7dd with merge 47a47f0f8ba775de36a751857867bfbea8310770...

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

r=me presuming perf looks good

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 9, 2021

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 47a47f0f8ba775de36a751857867bfbea8310770 (47a47f0f8ba775de36a751857867bfbea8310770)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued 47a47f0f8ba775de36a751857867bfbea8310770 with parent bc66b92, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking try commit (47a47f0f8ba775de36a751857867bfbea8310770): comparison url.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying rollup- to bors.

Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Apr 9, 2021
@jyn514
Copy link
Member Author

jyn514 commented Apr 9, 2021

Yup, that was it.

@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 9, 2021

📌 Commit 8c7b7dd has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 9, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 9, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 8c7b7dd with merge 8513e78...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 9, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 8513e78 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 9, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 8513e78 into rust-lang:master Apr 9, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.53.0 milestone Apr 9, 2021
@jyn514 jyn514 deleted the regex-in-loop branch April 9, 2021 21:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
I-compiletime Issue: Problems and improvements with respect to compile times. merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants